|
|
| Post Number: 1
|
dnlskier 
Group: Members
Posts: 1180
Joined: Jun. 2007
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 22 2013, 1:30 pm |
|
   |
CT.gov link
Good this law did? I do not understand how one would think these ideas in NY and by our president will stop another lunatic or "criminal"?
Obviously have not worked in the past... Chicago, Washington DC and well Mexico...
EDIT: for info on line look at - sec. 53-202 a,b,c
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 2
|
dnlskier
Group: Members
Posts: 1180
Joined: Jun. 2007
|
|
Posted on: Jan. 22 2013, 1:42 pm |
|
 |
More ct firearm info
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 3
|
Lamebeaver
trail? I don't need no stinkin trail!
Group: Members
Posts: 16212
Joined: Aug. 2004
|
|
Posted on: Jan. 28 2013, 2:17 pm |
|
|
Them Conneticutians, they thumk of just about everything.....
Sec. 53-206e. Limitation on sale and use of laser pointers. (a) As used in this section, "laser pointer" means a hand-held device that emits a laser light beam and is designed to be used by the operator to indicate, mark or identify a specific position, place, item or object.
(b) No person shall sell, offer to sell, lease, give or otherwise provide a laser pointer to a person under eighteen years of age, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section.
© No person under eighteen years of age shall possess a laser pointer on school grounds or in any public place, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section.
(d) A person may temporarily transfer a laser pointer to a person under eighteen years of age for an educational or other lawful purpose provided the person to whom the laser pointer is temporarily transferred is under the direct supervision of a parent, legal guardian, teacher, employer or other responsible adult.
(e) No person shall shine, point or focus a laser pointer, directly or indirectly, upon or at another person in a manner that can reasonably be expected to cause harassment, annoyance or fear of injury to such other person.
(f) Any person who violates any provision of this section shall have committed an infraction.
(P.A. 99-256.)
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 4
|
High_Sierra_Fan
Group: Members
Posts: 39533
Joined: Aug. 2005
|
|
Posted on: Jan. 28 2013, 2:19 pm |
|
|
Connecticut should ban those twirly fades between PowerPoint slides.
FAR more annoying than a laser pointer.
Oh and animated bullet points.
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 5
|
TigerFan
Group: Members
Posts: 1998
Joined: May 2010
|
|
Posted on: Jan. 28 2013, 4:35 pm |
|
|
(dnlskier @ Jan. 22 2013, 1:30 pm)
QUOTE CT.gov linkGood this law did? I do not understand how one would think these ideas in NY and by our president will stop another lunatic or "criminal"? Obviously have not worked in the past... Chicago, Washington DC and well Mexico... EDIT: for info on line look at - sec. 53-202 a,b,c
You're right, THAT law is worthless. But you're wrong in saying that that the law makes assault weapons illegal. It doesn't. It only makes possession of them illegal for a limited group of people, and I agree that such laws are ineffective.
If the REAL intent is to get rid of assault weapons, you need to stop commercial manufacturing and sales (i.e. non-military) across the country without any grand-father clauses.
(And I'm sure that would make you a lot happier...  )
--------------
Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survival Skills 101 • Eat Better
