|
|
| Post Number: 1
|
Ben2World 

Group: Members
Posts: 24135
Joined: Jun. 2005
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 22 2013, 1:59 pm |
|
 |
A 5 year old kindergartener brought her "bubble gun" to school and got herself a ten-day suspension (later shortened to two). Makes no sense to me. Read more here.
-------------- The world is a book and those who do not travel read only a page. -- St. Augustine
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 2
|
george of the j 

Group: Members
Posts: 465
Joined: Apr. 2006
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 22 2013, 8:10 pm |
|
 |
Complete insanity.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 3
|
Montanalonewolf 

Group: Members
Posts: 4888
Joined: Mar. 2010
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 12:02 am |
|
 |
Gotta be careful. No telling how damage a rugrat can manage with bubbles.
-------------- Ignorance is curable with education. Stupidity is refusing to be educated.
Those who don't read have no advantage over those who can't.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 4
|
dnlskier 

Group: Members
Posts: 1182
Joined: Jun. 2007
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 1:07 pm |
|
 |
She must be a REPUBLICAN!!! Ban her make a law not allowing any Republicans near school!! What an "independent," you say? therefore must be a REPUB! Ban them repubs - pure evil I say, LMAO!
Sorry, folks in my opinion have become increasingly crazy and there is not any commonsense left especially in our government.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 5
|
wwwest 

Group: Members
Posts: 4126
Joined: Dec. 2002
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 2:34 pm |
|
 |
Not nearly as crazy as thinking that all teachers should carry guns in their classrooms.
Some folks are trying to take steps to ratchet down our culture of violence, and of course it starts with the kids before junior high. They are not thinking that a bubble gun can hurt anyone, just attempting to get the point across that pointing any gun at any human is not acceptable behavior. Ever.
Much like education efforts to make smoking unacceptable, which started with seemingly ridiculous statements 40 years ago, but which is now very effective and has turned smoking from being okay, to being not okay.
We have gone from a country where smoking was the norm to a country where only about 20% smoke, and they are mostly older people. A look at the history:
Tobacco use became an ingrained habit in the Unites States (US) following the First World War [1], with per capita tobacco consumption increasing from six pounds in the 1880s, to approximately 13 pounds per person in the mid 20th century [2]. By this time cigarette smoking was the norm, and a large proportion of American physicians, similar to the general population, were smokers. Increasing public anxiety led to various advertising campaigns referring directly to physicians, in an attempt to assure consumers that tobacco products were safe [3,4]. Various American medical journals also carried tobacco advertisements during this period [5], although such practices were not limited to the US [6,7]. By the mid 1950s however, amidst growing public concern, tobacco industry strategists had determined that physicians were no longer credible in cigarette advertising, and commercials incorporating doctors began to slowly disappear [4]. Aside from increasing awareness within the medical community and their removal from advertising campaigns, many changes in the national smoking demographic were also catalysed by the release of the Surgeon General's landmark report in 1964 [8], where it was unequivocally decided that smoking was a health hazard of sufficient importance in the United States to warrant remedial action. The role of the American medical profession in meeting this challenge was therefore, abundantly clear.
http://www.tobaccoinduceddiseases.com/content/4/1/9
I don't think it will work at all, but I do understand the motivation of parents and school administrators who are trying to change a pervasive culture of violence that prevails in America today.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 6
|
dnlskier 

Group: Members
Posts: 1182
Joined: Jun. 2007
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 2:47 pm |
|
 |
wEST Said "Not nearly as crazy as thinking that all teachers should carry guns in their classrooms."
Exactly - another harebrained crazy idea! Teachers, are what? teachers, not infantry! Teach children not promote craziness as we all see daily in our lives.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 7
|
frihauf 

Group: Members
Posts: 1035
Joined: Feb. 2002
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 4:53 pm |
|
 |
The problem was that the "Bubble Gun" was fully automatic with a high capacity magazine. Definitely an assault rifle.
Ben
-------------- "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Ben Franklin
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 8
|
|
|
| Post Number: 9
|
TigerFan 

Group: Members
Posts: 2096
Joined: May 2010
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 5:20 pm |
|
 |
Many, if not most, schools have a zero-tolerance policy regarding violence, threats of violence, etc. I don't think they have a choice -- they have to follow the protocol.
Imo, you can't have it both ways. If you want schools to police the kids, then you have to expect them to cross every t and dot every i. Otherwise, when something happens, they're asked why the red flags weren't noticed, why the warnings/complaints weren't followed up, etc.
It seems to me that most parents are in favor of the zero-tolerance policy except when it's applied to their own kids because they "know" their kids would never actually threaten anyone...
-------------- Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 10
|
EastieTrekker 

Group: Members
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mar. 2012
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 6:13 pm |
|
 |
(TigerFan @ Jan. 23 2013, 5:20 pm)
QUOTE Many, if not most, schools have a zero-tolerance policy regarding violence, threats of violence, etc. I don't think they have a choice -- they have to follow the protocol.
Imo, you can't have it both ways. If you want schools to police the kids, then you have to expect them to cross every t and dot every i. Otherwise, when something happens, they're asked why the red flags weren't noticed, why the warnings/complaints weren't followed up, etc.
It seems to me that most parents are in favor of the zero-tolerance policy except when it's applied to their own kids because they "know" their kids would never actually threaten anyone... I agree with this sentiment 100%.
When the headlines read, "5yo week-long suspension for talking about bubbles" it sounds like the work of an incredibly stupid school district, but what's the reality here? It's the zero-tolerance policy that's driving this sort of reaction, and quite frankly that's the best approach the school can take.
No student should be exempted from this policy, even a 5yo. However, I think it would have been FAR more appropriate, for those involved with the punishment for violating this policy, to examine this instance completely before issuing the suspension. It was quite obvious to the school counselor that this little girl was not deranged, and upon learning that the discussion involved a "bubble gun" I think a frank talk between her, her teacher, and her parents about the potential danger guns can cause would have delivered the intended "lesson" far better.
-------------- I request all the possible consumer protection organizations, and fight with their injustice.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 11
|
Ben2World 

Group: Members
Posts: 24135
Joined: Jun. 2005
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 6:24 pm |
|
 |
(TigerFan @ Jan. 23 2013, 2:20 pm)
QUOTE Many, if not most, schools have a zero-tolerance policy regarding violence, threats of violence, etc. I don't think they have a choice -- they have to follow the protocol.
Imo, you can't have it both ways. If you want schools to police the kids, then you have to expect them to cross every t and dot every i. Otherwise, when something happens, they're asked why the red flags weren't noticed, why the warnings/complaints weren't followed up, etc.
It seems to me that most parents are in favor of the zero-tolerance policy except when it's applied to their own kids because they "know" their kids would never actually threaten anyone... School administrators and teachers are paid to exercise judgment. Otherwise, we can just have machines scan, track and teach our kids.
But I am not placing all blame on schools. Zero tolerance is idiotic. Has anyone tried "zero tolerance" parenting on a kid? Think back to our own formative years and imagine what we would be like under a "zero tolerance" system!
-------------- The world is a book and those who do not travel read only a page. -- St. Augustine
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 12
|
|
|
| Post Number: 13
|
Ben2World 

Group: Members
Posts: 24135
Joined: Jun. 2005
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 6:32 pm |
|
 |
(EastieTrekker @ Jan. 23 2013, 3:28 pm)
QUOTE (Ben2World @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:24 pm)
QUOTE Zero tolerance is idiotic. Has anyone tried "zero tolerance" parenting on a kid? Think back to our own formative years and imagine what we would be like under a "zero tolerance" system! Is zero-tolerance the issue, or is it the punishment that's doled out in response to that policy? I can't imagine a school having partial tolerance for guns, violence, drugs, etc. I think the issue here is that the punishment didn't really fit the (non)crime. I think an example of zero tolerance gone awry is this: a grade schooler brings in an aspirin. That is a drug, and the school subscribes idiotically to a policy that does not distinguish between drugs. And the student is suspended for a week. I recall reading about a case like this.
But how can one possibly draw up a comprehensive list of what's allowed vs. not allowed? We don't! We let the adults (i.e. the teachers, the school principal) deal with the occurrences, using established guidelines and their own professional judgment.
-------------- The world is a book and those who do not travel read only a page. -- St. Augustine
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 14
|
EastieTrekker 

Group: Members
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mar. 2012
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 6:38 pm |
|
 |
(Ben2World @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:32 pm)
QUOTE (EastieTrekker @ Jan. 23 2013, 3:28 pm)
QUOTE (Ben2World @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:24 pm)
QUOTE Zero tolerance is idiotic. Has anyone tried "zero tolerance" parenting on a kid? Think back to our own formative years and imagine what we would be like under a "zero tolerance" system! Is zero-tolerance the issue, or is it the punishment that's doled out in response to that policy? I can't imagine a school having partial tolerance for guns, violence, drugs, etc. I think the issue here is that the punishment didn't really fit the (non)crime. I think an example of zero tolerance gone awry is this: a grade schooler brings in an aspirin. That is a drug, and the school subscribes idiotically to a policy that does not distinguish between drugs. And the student is suspended for a week. I recall reading about a case like this. I'm in total agreement with that statement. A kid should not be automatically suspended for a week for having aspirin, but here's the catch.
Teacher sees said student give one of those "white pills" to another student. For all the teacher knows it could have just been aspirin, or it could have been Ecstasy. Now that the other student has consumed the pill, the teacher can no longer identify the substance so both students are suspended under the zero-tolerance policy. That's why the policy exists in the first place.
Stupid for suspending a student with aspirin, yes absolutely. But I'm sure with a note from his/her parents, and a visit to the school nurse before class would have avoided all the commotion. A little rigid? Yes, it is. And should teacher's/administrator's have the flexibility to reduce punishment (to nothing if appropriate)? Yes, absolutely, but I'd still argue the policy is good.
-------------- I request all the possible consumer protection organizations, and fight with their injustice.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 15
|
Ben2World 

Group: Members
Posts: 24135
Joined: Jun. 2005
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 6:46 pm |
|
 |
(EastieTrekker @ Jan. 23 2013, 3:38 pm)
QUOTE (Ben2World @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:32 pm)
QUOTE (EastieTrekker @ Jan. 23 2013, 3:28 pm)
QUOTE (Ben2World @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:24 pm)
QUOTE Zero tolerance is idiotic. Has anyone tried "zero tolerance" parenting on a kid? Think back to our own formative years and imagine what we would be like under a "zero tolerance" system! Is zero-tolerance the issue, or is it the punishment that's doled out in response to that policy? I can't imagine a school having partial tolerance for guns, violence, drugs, etc. I think the issue here is that the punishment didn't really fit the (non)crime. I think an example of zero tolerance gone awry is this: a grade schooler brings in an aspirin. That is a drug, and the school subscribes idiotically to a policy that does not distinguish between drugs. And the student is suspended for a week. I recall reading about a case like this. I'm in total agreement with that statement. A kid should not be automatically suspended for a week for having aspirin, but here's the catch. Teacher sees said student give one of those "white pills" to another student. For all the teacher knows it could have just been aspirin, or it could have been Ecstasy. Now that the other student has consumed the pill, the teacher can no longer identify the substance so both students are suspended under the zero-tolerance policy. That's why the policy exists in the first place. Stupid for suspending a student with aspirin, yes absolutely. But I'm sure with a note from his/her parents, and a visit to the school nurse before class would have avoided all the commotion. A little rigid? Yes, it is. And should teacher's/administrator's have the flexibility to reduce punishment (to nothing if appropriate)? Yes, absolutely, but I'd still argue the policy is good. I think we are in agreement. We need guidelines, but we also need teachers to make appropriate judgment calls.
The aspirin example was reported as a case where the type of drug was determined. In lieu of punishing (suspending) the kid -- the parents should have been called in -- so proper directions will be followed going forward.
OTOH, a kid passing out mystery white pills? The school will have to look deeper. But that's why teachers and principals are trained professionals.
To me, teachers and administrators who choose to do 'everything by the book' are doing both society and their own profession a great disservice.
-------------- The world is a book and those who do not travel read only a page. -- St. Augustine
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 16
|
|
|
| Post Number: 17
|
Montanalonewolf 

Group: Members
Posts: 4888
Joined: Mar. 2010
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 7:22 pm |
|
 |
http://www.neoflux.com/content/horrible/
-------------- Ignorance is curable with education. Stupidity is refusing to be educated.
Those who don't read have no advantage over those who can't.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 18
|
|
|
| Post Number: 19
|
dayhiker9 

Group: Members
Posts: 5309
Joined: Apr. 2003
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 9:47 pm |
|
 |
QUOTE I think we are in agreement. We need guidelines, but we also need teachers to make appropriate judgment calls.
I agree with this, if police are smart enough to do this surely teacher can.
But I have to disagree that this is even the issue. Kids have played with toy guns forever, and that is far different than threat real violence. And how is a 5 year old suppose to know that it is ok at home, but not AFTER school while waiting for a bus?
Now I could see them telling her parents they don't want this type of toy IN schools, though that would be more because it might be disruptive etc.
Terrorism, can anyone say that with a straight face, from a toy gun, much less a bubble gun. Next they will round kids up for having snow ball fights.
-------------- " before you make assertions about numbers, look at the numbers." Krugman
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 20
|
wwwest 

Group: Members
Posts: 4126
Joined: Dec. 2002
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 9:58 pm |
|
 |
Terrorism, can anyone say that with a straight face, from a toy gun, much less a bubble gun. Next they will round kids up for having snow ball fights.
No, as I pointed out above, it is not about this being terrorism, it is about changing from a culture of violence, even pretend violence, to a culture of non-violence.
If not with strict rules for young impressionable children, how do you propose to make the change from a culture of extreme violence to a culture of at least some level of non-violence?
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 21
|
|
|
| Post Number: 22
|
dayhiker9 

Group: Members
Posts: 5309
Joined: Apr. 2003
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 23 2013, 10:38 pm |
|
 |
(wwwest @ Jan. 23 2013, 6:58 pm)
QUOTE Terrorism, can anyone say that with a straight face, from a toy gun, much less a bubble gun. Next they will round kids up for having snow ball fights.
No, as I pointed out above, it is not about this being terrorism, it is about changing from a culture of violence, even pretend violence, to a culture of non-violence.
If not with strict rules for young impressionable children, how do you propose to make the change from a culture of extreme violence to a culture of at least some level of non-violence? Well maybe that is what it means to you, but
QUOTE Soon after, she was sent home after being issued a 10-day suspension for a "terroristic threat," as indicated on the suspension form signed by Mount Carmel Area Elementary School Principal Susan Nestico.
---------------
I am doubtful about it as far as changing a culture of violence.
For one kids played with guns long before the current problems.
Then there is TV and movies, and play after school etc.
Still I know so parents don't let their kids play with guns. It would be interesting to see what the effect is.
But I admit I am not a psychologist or anything so I suppose there is a case to be made there.
-------------------
Still why take this out on a 5 year old? If it was an older kid maybe. But a 5 year should be told by their parents, bus driver teacher etc. not to bring this toy, and this would not amount to suspension. I mean are we trying to tell a 5 year that ignorance of the school rules is no excuse? And where were the parents when she got on the bus etc.
-------------- " before you make assertions about numbers, look at the numbers." Krugman
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 23
|
gunslinger 

Group: Members
Posts: 6041
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 24 2013, 6:34 am |
|
 |
Privatize the school system and get DC out of the picture.
-------------- For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 24
|
|
|
| Post Number: 25
|
Montanalonewolf 

Group: Members
Posts: 4888
Joined: Mar. 2010
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 24 2013, 9:00 am |
|
 |
(GoBlueHiker @ Jan. 23 2013, 5:53 pm)
QUOTE (Montanalonewolf @ Jan. 23 2013, 5:22 pm)
QUOTE Spectacular source. Nearly all the links are broken in there, or go to pages that don't display anything like the headlines noted. Only 1 of the first 10 links actually works. I clicked several at random before posting and most seemed to work but I'll admit I didn't go past the first blurb.
Sorry.
-------------- Ignorance is curable with education. Stupidity is refusing to be educated.
Those who don't read have no advantage over those who can't.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 26
|
wwwest 

Group: Members
Posts: 4126
Joined: Dec. 2002
|
 |
Posted on: Jan. 24 2013, 9:42 am |
|
 |
For one kids played with guns long before the current problems.
Yes, absolutely! That is a big part of the problem.
Our culture of extreme violence began and grew with wiping out the native populations of both North and South America, and with practicing slavery for over 300 years, and then progressed to becoming THE world power which enforces our value system and ideas about democracy throughout the world with overwhelming warfare.
Changing that culture of violence will be nearly impossible, but you have to start small. the journey of 10,000 miles starts with a single step.
What makes you think that the 5 year old had not been told to leave the bubble gun at home, to never, ever bring it to school??
Nobody likes to test the limits more than a 5 year old, and no one needs to learn the consequences of violating the rules more than a 5 year old.
I know because I am spending a week in a condo and on the ski slopes with a 5 year old granddaughter!!
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 27
|
|
|
|
|
|